Introduction
The Framework
Four progressive levels of neurological assessment — from the non-negotiable safety net to a full clinical examination. Each level builds on the last and answers specific diagnostic questions that change what you do.
The core problem in prehospital neuro: Most crews can perform the tests but cannot interpret findings into a working localisation. This tool teaches both — what to do AND what it means anatomically.
The Four Levels
1
Safety Net Screen
The non-negotiable floor. Detects immediately life-threatening states and reversible causes. Every patient, every call.
2–3 minutes2
Localisation Screen
Tells you where the lesion is. Cortex, brainstem, or diffuse? UMN or LMN? Anterior or posterior circulation?
5–7 minutes3
Syndrome Identification
Turns findings into a named syndrome. Wallenberg? BPPV vs posterior stroke? Cerebellar vs sensory ataxia?
10–15 minutes4
Full Examination
Hospital-equivalent examination. Complete cranial nerve screen, MRC power grading, full sensory modalities, reflexes.
20–30 minutesKey Principles
Performing a test and interpreting a test are different skills. Most prehospital training covers technique but not localisation logic. This tool covers both. For every finding you will learn: what it means anatomically, what diagnostic conclusion it supports, and what decision it changes.
Localisation before diagnosis. The brain is anatomically organised. A lesion in one place produces a predictable pattern of deficits. Once you know the pattern, you know the location — and the location narrows the differential dramatically. Unilateral face + arm/leg = cortex/capsule. Crossed deficits (face one side, body other) = brainstem. Both legs = cord.
Time vs yield. Level 1 is non-negotiable. Level 2 adds 3–4 minutes and dramatically improves handover quality and clinical thinking. Level 3 is for undifferentiated presentations. Level 4 builds expert knowledge — rarely fully completed on scene.
Anatomy Quick Reference
Lesion Location → Expected Findings
| Location | Motor signs | Sensory signs | Other clues |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex (MCA) | Contralateral UMN — arm/face > leg | Contralateral hemibody | Dysphasia (dominant), neglect (non-dominant), gaze toward lesion |
| Internal capsule | Dense equal contralateral hemiplegia — face, arm, leg | Contralateral hemibody | No cortical signs — lacunar pattern |
| Brainstem | Crossed — ipsilateral face + contralateral body | Crossed or dissociated | Cranial nerve signs, vertigo, diplopia, dysphagia |
| Cerebellum | Ipsilateral ataxia — no true weakness | None typically | DANIISH signs, nystagmus, HINTS exam critical |
| Spinal cord | Bilateral UMN below level (may be flaccid acutely — spinal shock) | Sensory level — dermatomal | Bladder/bowel symptoms. Check level with pin prick. |
| Nerve root | Myotomal weakness | Dermatomal pain + sensory loss | Reflex loss at that root. Radicular pain. |
| Peripheral nerve | Named nerve territory | Named nerve territory | Wasting, fasciculations (LMN). Context: entrapment, DM, trauma. |
| Diffuse/metabolic | Symmetrical, generalised | Symmetrical or absent focal | Altered GCS, BM abnormal, no focal signs |
Level 1⏱ 2–3 minutes · Every patient
Safety Net Screen
The non-negotiable minimum. Detects immediately life-threatening states and reversible causes. Do this, do it properly, document it completely.
Diagnostic Question This Level Answers
Is this patient safe? Is there a reversible cause I must treat immediately? Do they need urgent transport? What is my baseline to track deterioration?
The Assessments
Blood Glucose (BM)
- 1Lateral fingertip — less nerve endings, less discomfort
- 2Adequate drop — don't squeeze excessively (dilutes sample)
- 3Document the number — not just "normal" or "low"
- 4Repeat if doubt, if patient deteriorates, or result doesn't fit
BM Interpretation
| BM | State | Action |
|---|---|---|
| <2.0 | Severe hypoglycaemia | IV 10% dextrose immediately |
| 2.0–3.9 + symptoms | Symptomatic hypoglycaemia | Glucose — IV or oral |
| 4.0–7.8 | Normal | No glucose intervention |
| 7.9–11.0 | Mildly elevated | Note — worsens stroke/TBI outcomes |
| >11.0 | Significant hyperglycaemia | DKA/HHS screen; ketones |
| >25.0 | Severe | HHS likely. Cautious IV fluids. Urgent. |
AVPU → GCS (document as E/V/M)
- Eyes (E 1–4): Spontaneous=4, To voice=3, To pain=2, None=1
- Verbal (V 1–5): Orientated=5, Confused=4, Words=3, Sounds=2, None=1
- Motor (M 1–6): Obeys=6, Localises=5, Withdraws=4, Abnormal flexion=3, Extension=2, None=1
- Always document as E/V/M (e.g. E3V4M5=12). Document the trend not just the number.
- Decorticate (M3): arms flexed, legs extended — above brainstem
- Decerebrate (M2): all extended — brainstem compression. Pre-terminal.
≤8 = consider airway intervention
3=minimum · 15=normal · GCS 15 does NOT exclude serious pathology
3=minimum · 15=normal · GCS 15 does NOT exclude serious pathology
Pupil Assessment — PERLA
- 1Dim lighting if possible
- 2Size in mm both sides (2mm=pinpoint, 4mm=mid, 7mm=dilated)
- 3Shape — round or irregular?
- 4Equality — same size? Anisocoria <1mm often physiological
- 5Direct reflex: light in → that pupil constricts
- 6Consensual reflex: light in one eye → BOTH constrict
| Finding | Think |
|---|---|
| Unilateral fixed dilated | CN III compression — PComm aneurysm / uncal herniation. EMERGENCY. |
| Bilateral fixed dilated | Brainstem death, anoxia, atropine/sympathomimetics |
| Bilateral pinpoint | Opioids (+ ↓RR), pontine haemorrhage, OP poisoning, clonidine |
| Unilateral partial miosis + ptosis | Horner's — sympathetic chain. Carotid dissection? |
| Pupil-sparing CN III palsy | Diabetic mononeuropathy (needs imaging) |
FAST / BE-FAST Screen
- BBalance: sudden loss of balance, unsteadiness, ataxia — catches posterior circulation
- EEyes: visual loss, diplopia, gaze deviation — catches posterior circulation
- FFace: "Show teeth / smile." Nasolabial fold flattening. Note: does forehead move equally? (key at Level 2)
- AArms: "Hold arms out, palms up, eyes closed." Watch for drift + pronation over 10 seconds.
- SSpeech: "Say British Constitution." Articulation wrong = dysarthria. Words themselves wrong = dysphasia. Critical distinction.
- TTime: Exact onset or last known well. Critical for thrombolysis (4.5h) / thrombectomy window.
Vital Signs in Neurological Context
- RR <12 + reduced GCS: respiratory depression — opioids, brainstem. Cheyne-Stokes = deep cerebral/brainstem lesion.
- SpO₂: target 94–98%. Hypoxia worsens ALL neurological injury. Hyperoxia worsens stroke/post-arrest.
- Cushing's triad: Hypertension + Bradycardia + Irregular respirations = raised ICP, imminent herniation.
- Temp: fever worsens neurological secondary injury. ≥41°C = active cooling in neuro patients.
- BP: both arms documented. Note which arm used for ongoing monitoring.
Cushing's triad is a late pre-terminal sign. Head 30° up, minimise stimulation, expedite immediately.
Level 1 — Finding → Decision
What Each Finding Changes
BM <4.0 + symptoms
Treat hypoglycaemia first. Reassess neuro signs after — may resolve (stroke mimic).
TREAT FIRSTGCS ≤8
Airway management consideration. Position, suction, consider OPA/NPA. Reassess continuously.
AIRWAYUnilateral fixed dilated pupil
CN III compression until proved otherwise. Herniation or PComm aneurysm.
EXPEDITEFAST positive
Stroke pre-alert. Note last known well precisely. Direct to HASU if in window.
PRE-ALERTCushing's triad
Raised ICP — head 30° up, avoid hypoxia, minimise stimulation.
CRITICALGCS 15, BM normal, FAST negative
Proceed to Level 2. Time allows deeper assessment.
GO TO L2Level 2⏱ 5–7 minutes · Any neuro presentation
Localisation Screen
Tells you WHERE the lesion is. This is the interpretive gap where most prehospital assessment stops. Each test here answers an anatomical question — cortex, brainstem, or diffuse? UMN or LMN?
Diagnostic Question This Level Answers
Where is the lesion? Is the pattern consistent with a cortical stroke, brainstem lesion, diffuse metabolic process, or spinal cord problem? Does my working diagnosis match the anatomical findings?
The Localisation Tests
1 — Pronator Drift (most sensitive early UMN sign)
TECHNIQUE
- 1Arms outstretched in front, palms UP (supinated), fingers spread
- 2Eyes closed — removes visual compensation
- 3Hold 10–15 seconds. Watch carefully.
- 4Optional: tap each arm gently downward and observe recovery speed
INTERPRETATION
- Normal: arms stay level, palms up, no drift
- Positive: arm drifts DOWN AND pronates (palm rotates inward). Contralateral UMN lesion.
- Why it works: pyramidal weakness affects extensors and supinators more — gravity plus lost anti-gravity control = drift. Supination requires active corticospinal effort.
- Clinical importance: often positive BEFORE you detect weakness on formal power testing. Most sensitive prehospital UMN sign.
- Cerebellar: arm may drift UPWARD — opposite of UMN
2 — Facial Assessment: The Critical UMN vs LMN Distinction
TECHNIQUE — IN ORDER
- 1"Raise your eyebrows" — watch forehead wrinkling both sides
- 2"Close your eyes tight" — try to force them open. Equal resistance?
- 3"Show me your teeth / big smile" — compare nasolabial folds
- 4"Puff your cheeks out" — symmetry?
UMN facial palsy (stroke): FOREHEAD SPARED. Lower face weak on side contralateral to lesion. Forehead wrinkles bilaterally. The forehead has bilateral cortical representation — the ipsilateral hemisphere takes over.
LMN facial palsy (Bell's, Ramsay Hunt, parotid): COMPLETE ipsilateral hemiface — forehead INVOLVED. Cannot wrinkle forehead on affected side. Cannot fully close eye. Forehead = always the differentiator.
3 — Eye Deviation and Gaze Preference
- 1Resting eye position — both eyes looking same direction?
- 2"Follow my finger" — horizontal H-pattern. Note restriction, nystagmus.
- 3In unconscious patient: passive head turn (doll's eyes) — eyes should counter-rotate if brainstem intact
Why it works — the anatomy
Each frontal lobe drives gaze to the opposite side. The pontine gaze centre (PPRF) drives gaze to the same side. Balanced = midline. Damage one and the other wins.
| Finding | Lesion |
|---|---|
| Eyes toward weak side | Cortical/capsular stroke — frontal eye field lost, pontine pulls eyes toward lesion side |
| Eyes away from weak side | Pontine lesion — PPRF lost, cortex pushes eyes contralateral |
| Eyes toward seizure, ictal | Irritative focus firing drives gaze away from focus — opposite of destructive |
| Eyes away from seizure, post-ictal | Exhausted cortex mimics destructive lesion transiently |
Wrong-way deviation — eyes opposite to expected for cortical lesion = large lesion with raised ICP affecting brainstem, or parietal neglect. Reconsider your localisation.
4 — Speech and Language
STEP 1 — Dysarthria vs Aphasia
- Dysarthria: words correct, articulation wrong — slurred, nasal, scanning. Motor problem. Language intact.
- Aphasia: the words themselves are wrong or absent. Always cortical. Almost always left hemisphere.
STEP 2 — Four-Question Screen (<90 sec)
| Ask | Tests | Fail = |
|---|---|---|
| "Close your eyes then stick out your tongue" | Comprehension | Wernicke's / receptive |
| "What is this?" (watch, pen) | Naming | Any aphasia type |
| "Repeat: no ifs, ands, or buts" | Repetition — arcuate fasciculus | Conduction aphasia if isolated |
| Spontaneous speech — fluent? | Production — Broca's area | Non-fluent = expressive / Broca's |
STEP 3 — Classify
| Type | Fluent? | Understands? | Repeats? | Lesion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broca's | No — effortful | Yes | No | Left frontal — anterior MCA |
| Wernicke's | Yes — but wrong | No | No | Left temporal — posterior MCA |
| Conduction | Relatively | Good | Severely impaired | Arcuate fasciculus — parietal |
| Global | No | No | No | Large left MCA |
| Nominal | Yes | Yes | Yes | Left temporal/parietal |
Wernicke's aphasia is routinely misdiagnosed as confusion. Patient talks fluently but has understood nothing you said. Consent, pain score, and history are unreliable. Document as aphasia — not confusion.
Broca's patients understand everything. They are often acutely distressed. Speak directly to them. Do not discuss them as though absent.
5 — Limb Power — Rapid Comparison
Not formal MRC grading — comparative testing to detect asymmetry.
- 1"Squeeze both my hands simultaneously" — compare grip
- 2"Push your feet down against my hands" — compare plantar flexion
- 3"Lift your knees up" — compare hip flexion
- 4Proximal > distal weakness = myopathy. Distal > proximal = neuropathy. Pyramidal = extensors weak (arm) / flexors weak (leg).
6 — Plantar Response (Babinski)
- 1Blunt object — key or back of pen
- 2Stroke firmly from heel along LATERAL sole, curve medially across ball of foot
- 3Normal = big toe FLEXES (curls down). Babinski positive = big toe EXTENDS (points up) ± fanning of other toes
Upgoing plantar = UMN pathology. In acute stroke or acute cord injury, reflexes may be absent initially (spinal shock) — do not be falsely reassured by absent reflexes in acute neurological injury.
7 — Neglect and Cortical Signs
Neglect Testing — Right MCA / Non-Dominant
Neglect is a failure to attend to one side of space. The patient isn't blind or weak in that territory — they simply don't register it. Common after right hemisphere strokes. Easily missed if you only look for weakness.
- 1Extinction: Wiggle fingers in both visual fields simultaneously. Patient detects each side alone but ignores one side when both stimulated simultaneously — the affected side "extinguishes."
- 2Gaze: Does the patient spontaneously look toward both sides? Persistent ipsilesional gaze without exploring the contralateral side = neglect.
- 3Limb awareness: "Are both your arms working?" A patient who denies weakness of a clearly paralysed limb (anosognosia) has right hemisphere parietal damage.
- 4Line bisection (if pen available): Draw a line. "Put a mark in the middle." Healthy people bisect accurately. Neglect = mark displaced toward the ipsilesional side.
Neglect Interpretation
Left-sided neglect is more common and more severe than right-sided neglect — the right hemisphere has a broader attentional role. A right MCA stroke causing left neglect can look deceptively mild on standard FAST because the patient may have relatively preserved motor power but be clinically significantly impaired.
- Neglect without weakness = non-dominant parietal cortex (usually right). Stroke, tumour, haemorrhage.
- Anosognosia (denial of deficit) = right parietal. Patient insists paralysed arm works fine. Not psychologically motivated — genuine neurological unawareness.
- Hemispatial neglect at handover: document explicitly — receiving team needs to know for falls risk, eating, rehabilitation planning.
- Extinction without neglect = milder form — each side intact alone but suppressed when competing. Early parietal sign.
Level 2 — Pattern → Localisation
Finding Pattern → Where is the Lesion?
Contralateral face + arm > leg + dysphasia
Left MCA territory cortical stroke. Dominant hemisphere. Pre-alert stroke team.
MCA STROKEDense equal face/arm/leg — no cortical signs
Internal capsule lacunar infarct. Small vessel. No dysphasia, no neglect.
LACUNARIpsilateral face + contralateral arm/leg
CROSSED DEFICIT = brainstem until proved otherwise. Add Level 3 cranial nerve screen.
BRAINSTEMBoth legs weak, no arms, no CN signs
Spinal cord or bilateral cortex (rare). Check sensory level. Ask re: bladder/bowel.
CORD?Symmetric, no focal signs, fluctuating GCS
Metabolic/toxic/diffuse encephalopathy. No lateralising lesion. Check BM again.
METABOLICLMN face (forehead involved) + no limb signs
Peripheral CN VII palsy. Bell's palsy or Ramsay Hunt most likely. Isolated.
BELL'SLevel 3⏱ 10–15 minutes · Undifferentiated neuro
Syndrome Identification
Turns a collection of findings into a named clinical syndrome. Level 2 tells you where — Level 3 tells you what. Requires knowledge of cranial nerve function, cerebellar signs, and vestibular testing.
Diagnostic Question This Level Answers
Which named syndrome does this presentation fit? Is this vertigo BPPV or posterior stroke? Is this Bell's palsy or Ramsay Hunt? Is the ataxia cerebellar or sensory? What cranial nerve is involved and what does that tell me anatomically?
Abbreviated Cranial Nerve Screen — Priority Order
Prehospital priority order: II → III/IV/VI → V → VII → VIII → IX/X → XII. Focus on the ones that change your diagnosis and pre-alert decision. I and XI are rarely time-critical on scene.
CN II — Optic | Vision and Pupil Afferent Pathway
- 1Acuity: "Can you read this text?" / count fingers / hand movements. Each eye separately.
- 2Fields: Confront — wiggle fingers in 4 quadrants of each eye. "Can you see my finger?"
- 3RAPD test: swing bright torch side to side 2–3 seconds each eye. Watch for dilation on the affected side (Marcus Gunn pupil).
| Field Defect | Localisation |
|---|---|
| Monocular loss | Eye or optic nerve — amaurosis fugax, optic neuritis (MS) |
| Bitemporal hemianopia | Optic chiasm — pituitary tumour |
| Homonymous hemianopia | Post-chiasm contralateral — posterior stroke, occipital |
| RAPD positive | Ipsilateral optic nerve disease — MS, ischaemic optic neuropathy |
CN III / IV / VI — Eye Movements and Nystagmus
- H-pattern tracking: follow finger in large H. Note restriction, ask about diplopia in each position.
- CN III (oculomotor): eye "down and out" + ptosis + dilated pupil. Surgical (pupil dilated) = aneurysm. Medical (pupil spared) = diabetic.
- CN IV (trochlear): diplopia worst looking down-inward (descending stairs). Head tilts to compensate. Most common cause: head trauma.
- CN VI (abducens): cannot abduct — failure to look laterally. Convergent squint. Horizontal diplopia worst toward weak side. False localising sign in raised ICP.
- INO (internuclear ophthalmoplegia): on lateral gaze, the adducting eye (moving medially) is slow or stops. Nystagmus in abducting eye. MLF lesion = MS or brainstem stroke.
NYSTAGMUS — PERIPHERAL vs CENTRAL
| Feature | Peripheral | Central |
|---|---|---|
| Direction | Horizontal/rotatory, unidirectional | Any — may change with gaze direction |
| Vertical | Never purely vertical | Can be purely vertical |
| Fixation | Suppressed by fixation | Not suppressed |
| Fatigability | Fatigues with repetition | Non-fatigable |
Purely vertical nystagmus is always central. Direction-changing nystagmus is always central. Either finding = posterior fossa until proved otherwise.
CN V — Trigeminal | Facial Sensation + Jaw
- 1Sensation: Light touch to forehead (V1), cheek (V2), chin (V3) both sides. "Same on both sides?"
- 2Corneal reflex: from side, touch cornea (not sclera) with cotton wisp. Both eyes should blink. Afferent CN V, efferent CN VII.
- 3Motor: "Clench jaw" — feel masseter. "Open mouth" — jaw deviates toward weak pterygoid.
Absent direct AND consensual blink when touching cornea = CN V afferent lesion. Absent direct blink only (but consensual preserved) = CN VII efferent lesion on that side. The distinction matters.
CN IX / X — Swallow, Palate, Voice
- 1Listen to voice — hoarse (X/vocal cord), nasal (palatal incompetence), slurred (VII/XII/cerebellar)
- 2"Open wide and say aah" — uvula rises midline. Deviation = away from CN X lesion
- 3Watch for pooling secretions, drooling, spontaneous coughing — signs of impaired swallow
- 4Gag reflex if indicated. Absent gag = up to 20% of normal adults — context matters.
- Bovine cough = weak breathy cough — vocal cord palsy CN X. Consider Pancoast tumour, aortic aneurysm.
- Any IX/X lesion = compromised airway protection. Plan accordingly.
CN VIII — Hearing and Balance
- Hearing screen: whisper test each ear separately
- Rinne's test: 512Hz fork on mastoid (bone) then in air. Air > bone = normal/SNHL. Bone > air = conductive loss.
- Weber's test: fork on forehead midline. Lateralises to conductive loss side OR away from SNHL side.
- Vestibular: dizziness, vertigo, nystagmus — see HINTS exam below
CN XII — Tongue Movement
- "Stick your tongue out" — note direction of protrusion
- Look for wasting, fasciculations (LMN — motor neurone disease)
- LMN: tongue deviates TOWARD the lesion (weak side). Wasting on affected side.
- UMN: tongue deviates AWAY from lesion. No wasting. Spastic tongue.
- Bilateral LMN (no tongue movement at all) = bulbar palsy — MND, bilateral CN XII lesion
Cognitive and Higher Cortical Screen
Bedside Cognitive Assessment — Confusion vs Aphasia vs Delirium vs Dementia
The prehospital label "confused" is diagnostically almost useless — it describes the observation but not the mechanism. The cognitive screen distinguishes four very different states that look similar but have different causes, urgencies, and destinations.
FIVE-MINUTE STRUCTURED SCREEN
| Domain | Test | Why this domain |
|---|---|---|
| Orientation | "What is today's date / where are we / who am I?" — person, place, time | First to go in delirium and dementia. Preserved in aphasia. |
| Attention | "Count backwards from 20" or "Months of the year backwards" | Impaired in delirium. Usually preserved in dementia early on. |
| Registration | "Remember these three words: apple, table, penny." Test immediately. | Immediate memory — tests registration not recall |
| Recall | After 3–5 minutes of other tasks: "What were those three words?" | Short-term memory — hippocampus. Fails early in dementia. |
| Dual task | Ask them to hold arms out and count backwards simultaneously | Frontal lobe executive function — fails in frontal lesions and delirium |
| Visuospatial | "Draw a clock face showing 10 past 11" (if pen available) | Right parietal + frontal planning. Neglect, dementia, delirium all impair this. |
INTERPRETING THE PATTERN
| State | Key features | Prehospital implication |
|---|---|---|
| Delirium | Acute onset, fluctuating, impaired attention, often agitated or withdrawn. Orientation and attention fail first. | Medical emergency — find the cause. Sepsis, hypoxia, metabolic, drugs, head injury, urinary retention. |
| Dementia | Chronic, stable or slowly progressive, family/carer usually knows. Recall fails before attention. Relatively coherent. | Baseline — ask carer what is normal. New change on baseline = acute delirium on dementia. |
| Wernicke's aphasia | Fluent speech, doesn't follow commands, appears confused but orientation cannot be tested because language is broken. | Not confused — aphasic. Left posterior hemisphere. Pre-alert stroke team. |
| Functional / psychiatric | Inconsistent performance, intact on casual conversation, distress prominent, usually younger. | Diagnosis of exclusion. Never assume functional until structural and metabolic excluded. |
Delirium on dementia is the most common pattern in elderly patients — the underlying dementia makes them more vulnerable. The acute change is the emergency, not the dementia itself. Always ask the carer "is this normal for them?"
The 4AT score — Alertness, AMT4 (age/DOB/place/year), Attention (months backwards), Acute change — is a validated 1-minute delirium screen you can run on any patient. Score ≥4 = probable delirium.
HINTS Exam — Acute Vertigo — Peripheral vs Posterior Stroke
Head Impulse · Nystagmus · Test of Skew
HINTS has higher sensitivity for posterior circulation stroke than early DWI MRI in the first 24–48 hours. Any single central feature = treat as posterior fossa stroke. Requires training — but knowing the framework is the starting point.
- HHead Impulse: Hold head, patient fixes on your nose. Rapid small rotation 10–15° to one side. Watch for catch-up saccade (corrective eye movement). Saccade present = PERIPHERAL = reassuring. No saccade = CENTRAL = danger.
- INystagmus: Direction-changing (changes with gaze direction) OR purely vertical = CENTRAL. Unidirectional horizontal = peripheral.
- TTest of Skew: Cover one eye, quickly uncover. Watch for vertical refixation (skew deviation — one eye higher than other). Present = CENTRAL.
| Peripheral (safe) | Central (stroke) | |
|---|---|---|
| Head Impulse | Abnormal (catch-up saccade) | Normal — NO saccade = DANGER |
| Nystagmus | Unidirectional horizontal-torsional | Direction-changing or vertical |
| Skew | No vertical skew | Vertical skew deviation |
Central pattern on ANY one component overrides the others. One central feature = treat as posterior stroke regardless of the other findings.
Coordination Tests
Finger-Nose · Heel-Shin · Dysdiadochokinesia
- 1Finger-nose: Hold your finger ~50cm away. "Touch your nose, then my finger." Move your finger each time. Watch for intention tremor and past-pointing (dysmetria).
- 2Heel-shin: Patient supine. "Place heel on opposite knee and slide down the shin to ankle." Watch for deviation off the shin.
- 3Dysdiadochokinesia: "Tap the back of your hand on your palm as fast as possible, alternating." Slow, irregular, clumsy = cerebellar.
Cerebellar = DANIISH
Dysdiadochokinesia · Ataxia · Nystagmus · Intention tremor · Impaired finger-nose · Scanning speech · Hypotonia — all IPSILATERAL to lesion
Dysdiadochokinesia · Ataxia · Nystagmus · Intention tremor · Impaired finger-nose · Scanning speech · Hypotonia — all IPSILATERAL to lesion
Romberg's Test — Sensory vs Cerebellar Ataxia
- 1Feet together, arms at sides. Stand close to catch patient.
- 2Observe 30 seconds eyes OPEN
- 3Then eyes CLOSED — observe 30 seconds
Romberg positive = stable eyes open, significantly unsteady eyes closed. Dorsal column / proprioceptive loss — sensory ataxia. Patient uses vision to compensate. Causes: B12 deficiency, MS, peripheral neuropathy, tabes dorsalis.
Ataxic eyes OPEN = cerebellar. Vision doesn't help cerebellar ataxia. Romberg is negative — equally unsteady regardless of eye state.
Named Syndrome Recognition
Wallenberg Syndrome (Lateral Medullary)
Ipsilateral: face pain/temp loss (V), Horner's, ataxia, dysphagia/hoarse (IX/X). Contralateral: body pain/temp loss (spinothalamic). PICA occlusion. No limb weakness — corticospinal tract spared (medial).
Weber Syndrome (Midbrain)
Ipsilateral CN III palsy (eye down/out, ptosis, dilated pupil). Contralateral hemiplegia (corticospinal). PCA territory infarct.
Foville Syndrome (Pons)
Ipsilateral CN VI (lateral gaze palsy) + CN VII palsy. Contralateral hemiplegia. Eyes deviate AWAY from lesion (opposite of cortical stroke). Pontine perforator.
Horner's Syndrome
Ipsilateral miosis (partial) + ptosis + anhidrosis. Sympathetic chain anywhere from hypothalamus to orbit. Key causes: carotid dissection, Pancoast tumour, lateral medullary stroke, thoracic cord lesion.
Cerebellar Stroke
DANIISH signs ipsilateral. Truncal ataxia — may not sit unsupported. Horizontal nystagmus. HINTS: normal head impulse = danger sign. PICA/AICA/SCA territories.
Cauda Equina Syndrome
Saddle anaesthesia (S3–S5) + bladder/bowel dysfunction + bilateral leg weakness. LMN signs (flaccid, areflexic). Emergency MRI — do not miss in back pain + leg neurology.
Level 4⏱ 20–30 minutes · Complex / learning / time permits
Full Clinical Examination
Hospital-equivalent neurological examination. Rarely fully completed on scene — but knowing it makes every lower level more meaningful and your clinical reasoning sharper. This is the level that builds toward expert practice.
Diagnostic Question This Level Answers
What is the exact motor power by muscle group? What is the precise sensory level? Which nerve root, nerve, or tract is involved? Is this UMN or LMN at each segment? Does the complete picture fit a single anatomical lesion?
Formal Motor Assessment — MRC Power Scale
MRC Scale — Formal Application and Technique
| Grade | Description | How to test |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No contraction at all | Visual and palpation — no flicker |
| 1 | Visible/palpable flicker | Watch for muscle belly twitch only |
| 2 | Movement, gravity eliminated | Test horizontally — arm slides on surface |
| 3 | Against gravity, no resistance | Can lift limb, you can overcome immediately |
| 4−/4/4+ | Against resistance — reduced | You can overcome with effort (−/=/+) |
| 5 | Normal power | Cannot overcome with full effort |
PYRAMIDAL PATTERN OF WEAKNESS
- Upper limb: extensors weaker — shoulder abduction, elbow extension, wrist/finger extension.
- Lower limb: flexors weaker — hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion.
- This explains the hemiplegic posture: arm flexed, leg extended. The stronger muscle groups dominate.
- LMN / myotomal pattern: specific muscle group only — follows nerve root or peripheral nerve territory
- Myopathic pattern: proximal > distal, symmetric — difficulty rising from chair, raising arms above head
Key Muscle Testing by Root Level
UPPER LIMB
| Root | Muscle | Test |
|---|---|---|
| C5 | Deltoid | Arm abduction 0–90° |
| C5/6 | Biceps / brachialis | Elbow flexion supinated |
| C6/7 | Wrist extensors (ECRL) | Wrist extension against resistance |
| C7 | Triceps | Elbow extension against resistance |
| C8 | Finger flexors (FDP) | Grip strength |
| T1 | Interossei | Finger abduction/adduction |
LOWER LIMB
| Root | Muscle | Test |
|---|---|---|
| L1/2 | Iliopsoas | Hip flexion against resistance |
| L3/4 | Quadriceps | Knee extension — knee jerk L3/4 |
| L4/5 | Tibialis anterior | Ankle dorsiflexion "pull toes up" |
| L5 | Extensor hallucis longus | Big toe extension — sentinel muscle for L5 |
| S1 | Gastrocnemius | Ankle plantarflexion — ankle jerk S1 |
| S3/4 | External sphincter | Anal tone on PR — cauda equina screen |
Full Sensory Assessment — Spinal Tract Anatomy
Two Tracts — Two Clinical Tests
DORSAL COLUMN (DCML) — Ipsilateral
- Carries: light touch, vibration, proprioception, 2-point discrimination
- Crosses: at medulla — contralateral cortical representation
- Test vibration: 128Hz fork on bony prominences — great toe MTP joint first, then move proximally until felt
- Test proprioception: hold toe at sides, move up or down, eyes closed. "Which way?" Start distal.
- Damaged by: B12 deficiency (subacute combined degeneration), MS, dorsal cord compression
SPINOTHALAMIC TRACT — Contralateral
- Carries: pain, temperature, crude touch
- Crosses: at the cord level it enters — so deficit is contralateral
- Test pain: neuro pin or orange stick. "Sharp or blunt?"
- Test temperature: cold metal of stethoscope or cold tuning fork
- Damaged by: anterior cord syndrome, syringomyelia (central cord — spinothalamic affected first), Brown-Séquard
Dissociated sensory loss = dorsal column and spinothalamic tracts affected differently. Classic: syringomyelia — pain/temp loss at level (spinothalamic), proprioception/vibration initially intact (dorsal column). Brown-Séquard: ipsilateral DC loss + contralateral spinothalamic loss — hemisection of cord.
Complete Reflex Assessment
Reflexes — Grading, Technique, and Significance
| Reflex | Root | Technique |
|---|---|---|
| Biceps | C5–C6 | Finger on tendon, tap finger |
| Supinator | C5–C6 | Tap radial styloid |
| Triceps | C6–C7 | Direct tap on triceps tendon |
| Knee (patellar) | L3–L4 | Leg relaxed, tap below patella |
| Ankle (Achilles) | S1–S2 | Foot dorsiflexed, tap Achilles |
| Plantar | L5–S1 | Lateral sole stroke — toe direction? |
GRADING AND MEANING
- 0 Absent: LMN, peripheral neuropathy. Always reinforce with Jendrassik (interlock fingers, pull apart during testing).
- + Reduced: LMN or peripheral neuropathy
- ++ Normal
- +++ Brisk: UMN, anxiety, hyperthyroid
- ++++ Clonus: ≥5 beats pathological — UMN. Cervical myelopathy, cord lesion.
- Hoffman's sign: flick middle fingernail downward — thumb and index flex = UMN upper limb (upper equivalent of Babinski). Cervical myelopathy.
- Inverted reflex: tapping biceps → finger flexion (not elbow) = C5/6 cord lesion. LMN at level + UMN below simultaneously.
UMN vs LMN — Complete Reference
Upper vs Lower Motor Neurone — Every Feature
| Feature | UMN — Central | LMN — Peripheral |
|---|---|---|
| Tone | Increased — spasticity (velocity-dependent, clasp-knife). Extrapyramidal = rigidity (lead pipe or cogwheel). | Decreased — flaccid |
| Power | Reduced — pyramidal distribution (extensors UL, flexors LL weakest) | Reduced — myotomal or named nerve territory |
| Reflexes | Brisk / hyperreflexic. Clonus may be present. | Diminished or absent. Cannot be reinforced. |
| Babinski | Extensor (upgoing) — PATHOLOGICAL | Flexor (normal downgoing) |
| Wasting | Late, mild — disuse only | Early, marked — denervation atrophy |
| Fasciculations | Absent | Present — spontaneous muscle fibre contractions visible through skin |
| Acute phase | May be FLACCID/AREFLEXIC initially — spinal shock. Evolves to spasticity over days/weeks. | Always flaccid/areflexic from onset |
| Lesion location | Brain, brainstem, spinal cord (above anterior horn cell) | Anterior horn cell, nerve root, plexus, peripheral nerve, NMJ, muscle |
Spinal shock: Acute cord injury presents with FLACCID tone, AREFLEXIA, and autonomic failure below the level — mimicking LMN. This resolves over hours–weeks, evolving into expected UMN signs. Do not interpret acute flaccid areflexia in a cord injury patient as evidence of an LMN lesion.
Gait Patterns — Recognition and Anatomical Basis
Gait Analysis — Complete Reference
| Gait | Description | Anatomical basis | Causes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hemiplegic | Stiff extended leg swings in arc (circumduction). Arm flexed/adducted. | Unilateral UMN — internal capsule / motor cortex | Stroke, TBI |
| Scissor | Both legs stiff, adducted, cross midline | Bilateral UMN | Cerebral palsy, bilateral cord lesion |
| Steppage | High knee lift to clear foot — foot slap on landing | Foot drop — common peroneal nerve / L4/5 | L4/5 disc, common peroneal palsy (fibular head), stroke (mild) |
| Cerebellar ataxic | Wide-based, unsteady, falls toward lesion side. Eyes open or closed — equally bad. | Ipsilateral cerebellum | Cerebellar stroke, MS, alcohol, tumour |
| Sensory ataxic | Wide-based, stamps feet, dramatically worse eyes closed (Romberg positive) | Dorsal column proprioceptive loss | B12 deficiency, MS, tabes dorsalis, large fibre peripheral neuropathy |
| Parkinsonian / festinating | Stooped, small shuffling steps, accelerates forward, reduced arm swing, en-bloc turning | Basal ganglia — nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway | Parkinson's disease, drug-induced (metoclopramide, haloperidol, prochlorperazine) |
| Waddling / Trendelenburg | Hip drops on contralateral side with each step — lateral shift of trunk | Proximal muscle weakness / hip girdle | Myopathy, muscular dystrophy, bilateral hip OA |
| Apraxic | Feet barely leave floor — "walking on ice". Normal power on formal testing when lying. Normal tone. | Frontal lobe — motor planning disconnection | Normal pressure hydrocephalus, vascular dementia, frontal tumour |
| Antalgic | Short stance phase on one side — minimises weight through painful limb | Pain — not neurological | Hip/knee pathology, fracture |
Reference
Localisation Logic
The interpretive framework — how to take your findings and reason toward the anatomical location of the lesion. This is the skill that separates systematic assessment from genuine clinical pattern recognition.
The Five-Step Localisation Process
Unilateral or bilateral? Unilateral findings = structural lesion (stroke, tumour, haemorrhage, demyelination). Bilateral symmetrical = metabolic/toxic (hypoglycaemia, uraemia, drugs, septic encephalopathy, alcohol) or bilateral structural (cord, bilateral cortical very rare).
Are there cranial nerve signs? If yes — are CN signs on the SAME side as limb weakness (= above brainstem, cortex/capsule, both contralateral) OR OPPOSITE side (= CROSSED DEFICIT = brainstem until proved otherwise — ipsilateral CN + contralateral limb)?
UMN or LMN signs? Brisk reflexes + Babinski + spasticity = UMN (above anterior horn cell). Absent/reduced reflexes + flaccidity + wasting + fasciculations = LMN (at or below anterior horn cell). Mixed at one level = cord lesion at that level affecting both.
Which limbs are involved? All four = cord above C4 or diffuse. One side face/arm/leg = hemiplegia (cortex/capsule/brainstem/cervical cord). Both legs only = paraplegia (thoracic/lumbar cord or bilateral parasagittal cortex). One arm + same leg + same face = corticospinal anywhere.
Sensory pattern? Hemibody = thalamus/cortex/internal capsule. Dermatomal band = nerve root. Glove and stocking = peripheral neuropathy length-dependent. Clear sensory level = cord. Dissociated (one tract affected, other preserved) = cord lesion — syrinx or Brown-Séquard.
Clinical Pattern → Lesion Site
Finding Pattern → Localisation → Classic Cause
| Pattern | Lesion | Think first |
|---|---|---|
| Contralateral hemiplegia + dysphasia + gaze toward lesion | Left MCA cortex (dominant) | Ischaemic stroke — pre-alert HASU |
| Dense equal face/arm/leg hemiplegia — no cortical signs | Internal capsule (lacunar) | Small vessel disease — hypertension |
| Ipsilateral CN III palsy + contralateral hemiplegia | Midbrain — Weber syndrome | PCA territory infarct |
| Ipsilateral CN VI/VII + contralateral hemiplegia + eyes deviate away from weak side | Pons — Foville syndrome | Basilar perforator infarct |
| Ipsilateral face pain/temp loss + Horner's + ataxia + dysphagia + contralateral body pain/temp loss | Lateral medulla — Wallenberg | PICA occlusion |
| Bilateral leg weakness + sensory level + bladder symptoms | Spinal cord — find the level | Cord compression, MS, trauma |
| Dermatomal pain + myotomal weakness + reflex loss at one level | Nerve root — radiculopathy | Disc prolapse, foraminal stenosis |
| Ipsilateral ataxia, no weakness, DANIISH signs | Ipsilateral cerebellum | PICA/AICA/SCA stroke, MS, alcohol |
| Symmetric distal weakness and sensory loss — glove and stocking | Peripheral nerves — length-dependent | Diabetic neuropathy, alcohol, B12 |
| Fluctuating GCS, symmetric, no focal signs, BM abnormal | Diffuse/metabolic — no structural lesion | Hypoglycaemia, septic encephalopathy, drugs |
| Saddle anaesthesia + bilateral leg LMN + bladder/bowel | Cauda equina (conus/roots S1–S5) | Disc prolapse, tumour — MRI emergency |
Speed of Onset → Aetiology
Temporal Pattern Narrows the Differential
| Onset | Pattern | Think first |
|---|---|---|
| Seconds — maximal at onset | Sudden, no warning | Vascular — ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, SAH (thunderclap headache) |
| Minutes | Rapid progression from onset | Stroke (progressing), seizure, Todd's paresis, hypoglycaemia |
| Hours | Gradual build over hours | Expanding haematoma (extradural, SDH), encephalitis, ascending GBS |
| Days | Progressive, subacute | Tumour with oedema, ADEM, subacute SDH, inflammatory |
| Weeks to months | Slowly progressive | Tumour, chronic SDH, degenerative (MND, Parkinson's, MS progressive) |
| Relapsing-remitting | Episodes with recovery between | MS, TIA (no recovery = stroke), migraine with aura, epilepsy, channelopathy |
Self-Test
Knowledge Check
Seven clinical scenarios across all levels. Select an answer to get immediate feedback with the clinical reasoning explained in full.
Clinical Scenarios
Tap an answer to reveal the explanation. Correct answer highlighted in green if you get it wrong.
Q1 — 68-year-old, sudden onset right arm and face weakness. Cannot get words out despite appearing to understand you. BM 7.2. Where is the lesion most likely?
Q2 — You test pronator drift. The left arm drifts down and pronates. Which side has the UMN lesion?
Q3 — Patient has right-sided face weakness including the forehead, with right eye unable to fully close. The rest of the neuro exam is normal. What does this indicate?
Q4 — 55-year-old, sudden severe vertigo, vomiting, cannot walk. HINTS exam: normal head impulse (no corrective saccade), direction-changing nystagmus, no skew deviation. What is the most likely diagnosis?
Q5 — Patient unconscious, bilateral pinpoint pupils, respiratory rate 8. You consider naloxone. What sign most usefully differentiates opioid toxidrome from pontine haemorrhage on scene?
Q6 — Patient presents with: ipsilateral right face pain/temperature loss, right Horner's syndrome, right limb ataxia, dysphagia and hoarse voice — AND contralateral left body pain/temperature loss. No limb weakness. Where is the lesion?
Q7 — Patient involved in RTC, suspected T6 spinal cord injury. On assessment you find flaccid tone and absent reflexes in both legs. What is the correct interpretation?