Tick off as reviewed. These are the pillars the whole position rests on.
MHA s135/136 is the exception worth knowing cold, because the officer is the one who lawfully instigated the detention.
Officer detains under s136 → must request an ambulance. Ambulance service is required to transport all s136 detentions. It is for paramedics to decide, having assessed the individual, whether they go directly to ED or to a place of safety — police custody should only be used in exceptional circumstances, health needs always come first.
MHA 1983 s136 National Ambulance s136 Protocol 2014Once an Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) completes an application, s6 gives authority to detain and convey; the patient is then in the AMHP's legal custody under s137. That authority can be delegated (often to police), and reasonable force may be used as necessary and proportionate — but this is a distinct, formally-triggered legal status, not a general police power.
MHA 1983 ss.6, 137If a detainee under s135/136 can't be roused, or a registered medical practitioner assesses they are not mentally disordered, they must be immediately discharged from that detention — the medical assessment directly ends the legal basis for holding them, not the other way round.
PACE Code C 2023, para 3.16| Domain | Who decides | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment / clinical priority | Registered clinician (you) | Common law duty of care, HCPC standards |
| Conveyance destination & timing | Registered clinician (you) | Common law + PACE Code C priority on health needs |
| Whether the person is under arrest | Police | PACE 1984 ss.24–30 |
| Continuity of custody / evidence | Police — but must adapt around clinical need | PACE Code C |
| Scene safety / public order | Police / Fire (as relevant) | Common law, respective operating procedures |
| Extrication method (structural/vehicle) | Fire, in consultation with ambulance on patient factors | Joint protocols (JESIP) |
"He's still under arrest and you're welcome to travel with us or meet us at [ED] — but he needs to go now on clinical grounds, and I can't delay that."
Separates the two questions cleanly: custody continuity is theirs to solve, timing is yours to decide.
This page is a working clinical/CPD reference, not legal advice. For a live dispute or formal complaint, verify current wording against the linked primary sources and take Trust legal/professional advice.