Prehospital Legal Reference · Not Legal Advice

Clinical vs Custody Authority

Who has the final say over an injured or unwell patient who is also under arrest or police suspicion — ambulance, police, or fire. Sourced against PACE Code C, common law duty of care, and HCPC standards.
Checked: 0/0 Last reviewed: Aug 2026 Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Headline position: There is no single named Act that hands clinical authority to ambulance staff over police. It is built from three converging sources — common law duty of care (negligence), PACE Code C (which explicitly subordinates custody process to medical need), and HCPC registrant standards. Net effect: arrest changes who has custody of the person, not who makes clinical decisions. Police cannot lawfully instruct a registered clinician to delay treatment or conveyance for investigative convenience.

01 Core legal basis — checklist

Tick off as reviewed. These are the pillars the whole position rests on.

Common law duty of care (negligence)
Once a registered clinician begins assessment/treatment, a direct duty of care exists to that patient. This duty is not discharged or transferred by a third party's instruction (e.g. a police officer telling the crew to wait). If harm follows a delay, "we were told to wait" is not a defence for the clinician or Trust — clinical judgement, not rank or instruction, sets the standard.
Common law Bolam / Bolitho standard applies
PACE Code C — health needs take priority
Code C (statutory Code of Practice under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984) governs detention, treatment and questioning of persons in police custody. Its own internal logic makes medical need override custody processing — e.g. detainees who cannot be roused must immediately be treated as a medical emergency, and use of custody as a "place of safety" is only for exceptional circumstances with health needs always coming first.
This is the strongest citable document at scene — GMP, LAS and NWAS custody-liaison protocols are all built downstream of it.
PACE Code C 2023 — gov.uk
PACE Code C, Annex H — rousing / medical emergency
Annex H requires that if a detainee fails to meet the specified rousing criteria, an appropriate healthcare professional or an ambulance must be called. College of Policing guidance reinforces this: if a detainee cannot be roused, they should immediately be treated as a medical emergency — full stop, no discretion to "wait and see."
IOPC recommendation re: Annex H — policeconduct.gov.uk
HCPC Standards of Proficiency / Conduct, Performance and Ethics
As the registered professional physically present, the paramedic is the one legally accountable for the clinical decision. Police officers hold no clinical qualification and have no statutory mechanism to override a treatment or conveyance decision. Deferring a clinical decision to a non-clinician's instruction is itself a professional standards issue for the registrant who does it.
Professional regulation
Arrest ≠ clinical authority
An arrest under PACE gives police lawful grounds to retain custody of the person (so they don't leave, and evidence/continuity is preserved). It does not, in itself, create any power over what treatment that person receives or when. The detained status has to be managed around the clinical decision — travelling with the crew, following to ED, arranging continuity — not the other way round.
PACE 1984, ss.24–30 (arrest powers)
Outside arrest/detention: police have no authority over the patient at all
If there is no arrest, no s135/136 detention, and no other specific statutory power in play, an officer at scene has the same standing as any member of the public with respect to the patient. Their remaining powers (scene control, evidence preservation, public order) relate to the environment, not the person.

02 Mental Health Act — the one genuine grey zone

MHA s135/136 is the exception worth knowing cold, because the officer is the one who lawfully instigated the detention.

s136 (public place detention)

Officer detains under s136 → must request an ambulance. Ambulance service is required to transport all s136 detentions. It is for paramedics to decide, having assessed the individual, whether they go directly to ED or to a place of safety — police custody should only be used in exceptional circumstances, health needs always come first.

MHA 1983 s136 National Ambulance s136 Protocol 2014

s6 / s137 (post-AMHP application)

Once an Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) completes an application, s6 gives authority to detain and convey; the patient is then in the AMHP's legal custody under s137. That authority can be delegated (often to police), and reasonable force may be used as necessary and proportionate — but this is a distinct, formally-triggered legal status, not a general police power.

MHA 1983 ss.6, 137

Rousing failure under detention (Annex H, again)

If a detainee under s135/136 can't be roused, or a registered medical practitioner assesses they are not mentally disordered, they must be immediately discharged from that detention — the medical assessment directly ends the legal basis for holding them, not the other way round.

PACE Code C 2023, para 3.16

03 Who controls what — quick table

DomainWho decidesBasis
Treatment / clinical priorityRegistered clinician (you)Common law duty of care, HCPC standards
Conveyance destination & timingRegistered clinician (you)Common law + PACE Code C priority on health needs
Whether the person is under arrestPolicePACE 1984 ss.24–30
Continuity of custody / evidencePolice — but must adapt around clinical needPACE Code C
Scene safety / public orderPolice / Fire (as relevant)Common law, respective operating procedures
Extrication method (structural/vehicle)Fire, in consultation with ambulance on patient factorsJoint protocols (JESIP)

04 Worked scenario

Patient under arrest for car theft, badly injured, currently on the ambulance. Officer wants you to wait.
He remains under arrest throughout — that status doesn't lapse because he's being treated, and the officer is entitled to travel with him or arrange continuity to hospital. What the officer cannot do is direct your clinical timeline. "Wait, we need to get a statement / wait for CID / wait for forensics" has no legal basis to override your assessment that he needs to leave now. If you comply and he deteriorates, the negligence exposure sits with the crew/Trust — the instruction from police is not a defence. Document: your clinical rationale, the specific request made by police, your response, and the time you proceeded. That contemporaneous record is what actually protects you, more than any single Act you could quote at the roadside.

05 Practical phrase for scene

"He's still under arrest and you're welcome to travel with us or meet us at [ED] — but he needs to go now on clinical grounds, and I can't delay that."

Separates the two questions cleanly: custody continuity is theirs to solve, timing is yours to decide.

06 Sources

This page is a working clinical/CPD reference, not legal advice. For a live dispute or formal complaint, verify current wording against the linked primary sources and take Trust legal/professional advice.